comparative-law

CSC is an open, collaborative framework to document and compare the principles, laws, ethics, customs, and experiences that have guided intelligent beings across history—and may govern future intelligences, including artificial intelligences, biorobots, and potential extraterrestrial sapients.

Evenhanded comparative analysis of AI governance: EU vs. US vs. China. Nine-dimension table, reproducible figures, and an IEEE paper. Snapshot as of 2026-08-25.

Report on Freedom of Expression around the world based on the LEX dataset, a legal corpus of Expression, Defamation, and Mis-/Disinformation Laws.

Cross-border intellectual property as structured, cited, versioned data: compare protection across jurisdictions, with deterministic engines and an as-of date so questions are answered under the law then in force.

PRC-first legal semantic alignment framework for constraining US legal concepts within Chinese-law reasoning contexts.

Source-traceable comparison of EU and China AI and data law — one question per comparison, every claim graded and dated

Comparative empirical legal study of enacted social media regulation across eight regulatory systems.

Reproducible issue-level audit of national courts' reasoning on the Article 267(3) TFEU preliminary-reference obligation.

How every legal system processes death, default, and the erasure of personhood. 35+ jurisdictions, 10 legal traditions, 7 dictionaries.

Supplementary materials for a multimethod study of de jure tax harmonization in African Regional Economic Communities. Includes an XML template, decision criteria, data types, NLP methodology and code, and comparative findings. The underlying dataset is not included.

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Map — 130 countries, 3299 cells. Data mirror of https://safelegalai.com/regulation (CC BY 4.0, no warranty; not legal advice). Every row links to its record.