[ryoji-info]

Documentation only; the manuscripts in papers/ are untouched. Net change against main: the DOI commit 7862923. (The branch also carries cbba2c9, which disposed the two sweep hits that had kept CI red since 9d5cee2; main received the same fix as 4c72f00 while this PR was being opened, so the merge of main keeps 4c72f00's dispositions and cbba2c9 contributes nothing to the diff. A squash merge gives one commit.)

Cite the 29 October 2026 Zenodo deposits and discharge the errata

The repository still cited the July 2026 deposits (10.5281/zenodo.21606810, 10.5281/zenodo.21607070) and called the October revisions "not yet deposited". Verified on the Zenodo API (open, CC BY 4.0, published 2026-10-29); each deposited PDF has the MD5 of the repository copy at 9d5cee2:

paper	version	DOI
Part I	v6.1	10.5281/zenodo.23758795
Part II	v2.1	10.5281/zenodo.23758729
Part III	v1.1	10.5281/zenodo.23758679

• README.md: DOI badges (plus a Part III badge), the papers table and its note.
• CITATION.cff: preferred citation v6.1 / month 10 / new DOI; Part II v2.1 and Part III v1.1 references with their DOIs. Parses.
• papers/ERRATA.md: no outstanding rows. The 30 Part I rows (I-11 … I-40) and 19 Part II rows (II-6 … II-24) are discharged by the deposits, per the file's own rule and the July precedent, and moved verbatim to the ends of the v6.1 and v2.1 blocks of papers/REVISION-HISTORY.md (the row lines diff clean against main).
• papers/REVISION-HISTORY.md: deposits table and index rows, the four deposit-status lines, the errata bullets, the footer, and two dated editorial notes.
• docs/POSITIONING.md, notes/INDEX.md, notes/CITATIONS.md, ROADMAP.md, agents/README.md: the same status wording.
• ledger_sweep.py: the two DISPOSED_FILE reason strings name the v6.1 / v2.1 deposits, as e490f1f did for the July ones.

Also on the record now: Part III v1.0 was deposited, on 4 October 2026, as 10.5281/zenodo.23132802 (same concept DOI, no version label; its PDF has the MD5 of the v1.0 file at dba47d0). The repository had listed it as "never deposited". Corrected in the deposits table, the index row and the v1.0 block, with an editorial note after that block.

Checks on this branch (after merging main)

• python -m pytest tests/ -q: 50 passed
• python ledger_listing.py: exit 0
• python ledger_sweep.py: UNDISPOSED HITS: 0

Points to confirm

1. The "draft" label is dropped for Part III v1.1 wherever it was paired with "not yet deposited"; the deposited PDF does not call itself a draft. v1.0 keeps "superseded".
2. The 49 ERRATA rows are discharged (the file's rule: remove a row when a revision carrying the correction is deposited, moving it under that revision in REVISION-HISTORY). To keep them in ERRATA.md instead, revert papers/ERRATA.md and drop the two "Errata rows discharged …" subsections.
3. v6.1 was deposited with the v6.0 figure rasters as they stood (the block had said they were to be redrawn before the deposit); the item now reads as open at the deposit. Whether that deserves an ERRATA row is the maintainer's call.
4. The deposited manuscripts cite one another by the July DOIs and call Part III "not yet deposited", since they were finalised before the deposits; recorded in an editorial note in the Deposits section rather than changed.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code