Skip to content

Require owner review for workflow changes - #453

Merged
lynnswap merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/protect-release-workflows
Oct 30, 2026
Merged

lynnswap merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/protect-release-workflows

Conversation

@lynnswap

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Require @lynnswap ownership for all files under .github/workflows/, including newly added workflows, and for .github/CODEOWNERS itself.

Details

The associated main ruleset update enables required Code Owner review while retaining zero general approvals. Workflow changes will require owner approval; collaborators can continue merging other changes without an approving review. The existing PR requirement and stale-review dismissal remain in place.

Testing

  • git diff --check passed.
  • Checked ownership for existing, new, and nested workflow paths and the CODEOWNERS file; application code, release scripts, README, and actionlint configuration remain outside the ownership rules.
  • Local Codex review completed with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-30T06:23:22.256563Z b9f7c4b PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-30T06:24:46.103979Z b9f7c4b PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@lynnswap
lynnswap merged commit cd16e7d into main Oct 30, 2026
7 checks passed
@lynnswap
lynnswap deleted the codex/protect-release-workflows branch October 30, 2026 06:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant