The maintained computational surface is indexed in the machine-readable
script and artifact registry. Run the ordinary
scientific gate from the repository root with
python verification/run_verification.py; it validates registry/provenance,
regenerates the canonical runtime ledger, and runs
python -m pytest -q verification. Registry roles distinguish canonical,
validation, forecast, synthetic, retired, utility, and historical
surfaces. The separate run_all_checks.py
command is a process-only smoke harness and is not scientific evidence.
Input provenance and generated-artifact ownership are recorded in the
provenance.json and
artifact_manifest.json manifests. Current runtime provenance and the distinction from historical publications are described in PUBLICATION_STATUS.md.
The accepted finite-temperature closure adds two bounded, live calculations.
The master response rebuilds eight W8/U16 states and publishes 160 complex
off-pole/static rows plus 32 analytic spacelike absorptive-cut rows. Each
response keeps all six components of the three density/scalar/longitudinal-
current operators, the Ward/static/dynamic controls, the full 4x4 saddle
elimination, and both declared scales without applying a scale twice. The
composition bridge publishes 32 canonical rows with mu_B, mu_D, free
energy, pressure, the full Hessian and inverse, and the (B,Q) coordinate map.
The fixed j=11.13601607117819 MeV contact is a conditional known input only:
these are local mathematical bridges, not a new force, an all-frequency
positive spectral-measure proof, or experimental confirmation.
Reports: thermal master response, thermal composition Hessian, and the accepted closure note.
Focused reproduction (write JSON outside the checkout):
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 .venv-research/bin/python3.12 -B verification/nvg_thermal_master_response.py \
--output /tmp/nvg_thermal_master_response_results.json
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 .venv-research/bin/python3.12 -B verification/nvg_thermal_composition_hessian.py \
--output /tmp/nvg_thermal_composition_hessian_results.json
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 PYTHONPATH=verification .venv-research/bin/python3.12 -B -m unittest \
verification.test_thermal_master_response \
verification.test_thermal_composition_hessian -vUse Python 3.12 and a fresh environment; CI uses the same requirements and resolved constraints. From the repository root:
python3.12 -m venv .venv-research
.venv-research/bin/python -m pip install -r requirements.txt -c constraints-python312.txt
.venv-research/bin/python -m pip check
.venv-research/bin/python verification/run_verification.pyThe constraints pin NumPy 1.26.4, SciPy 1.13.1, mpmath 1.3.0 and the remaining
verification dependencies. Python 3.9 environments from older runs, including
an existing .venv, are not the supported setup. Preserve them if needed and
use the fresh environment above. With another working directory, pass the
absolute path to both the environment's Python and run_verification.py.
PyCBC is included because the semantic suite imports the echo-search modules.
Optional live GW fetching additionally requires gwosc and external data access.
The source-complete model document (Russian) states the action, parameter provenance, EOS and independently calculated consequences of the effective one-component model. Its fixed parameters do not reproduce symmetric nuclear-matter saturation: at the reference density, the pressure is positive and the energy per baryon exceeds the rest mass. Numerical consistency therefore does not establish a physical neutron-star model or empirical confirmation. The maintained calculation has an equilibrium audit, a mathematical stellar sequence, and a vacuum-spectrum/conditional-response audit. Current artifact acceptance is recorded in the registry and manifest above; the model document explains the physical limits independently of that status.
Two no-fit boundary calculations now make the nuclear limitation more precise.
For the unmodified static, zero-temperature d=4, s=1 Thomas--Fermi
functional, a sharp inequality proves (E>N_BM_N) for every finite
configuration: the live coefficient (C=3\pi^2\lambda W_0^4/(8M_N^4))
is (2.72164>1/4), so this restricted functional has no self-bound droplet.
Separately, its leading tree/static exchange between two same-sign N
currents is repulsive at every (r>0). The latter is not a deuteron or
full NN prediction: (g_\omega^2/(16\pi^2)=0.649), so loops, QCD channels
and the missing quantum sectors are not controlled. See the
finite-droplet audit and
static two-baryon audit.
Combining those two restricted calculations yields a useful no-fit scale map,
not a repaired theory: in a formal deformation that changes only
(\lambda), the Q4 certificate ceases to be strict below
(\lambda_{Q4}=0.0964492), while the same tree/static kernel becomes
attractive at (Q=0) only below (\lambda_{q0}=0.00484225). The live
value is (1.05); this is a substantial change of the scalar action, and
the resulting interval neither selects a parameter nor proves binding. The
cross-scale gate records
the exact assumptions, range-sign consequence, and limits.
Solving that same formal, spinless tree/static S-wave Hamiltonian is a
stronger follow-up: its first zero-energy threshold is only
(0.0011028<\lambda_c^{\rm formal}<0.0011029), about 952 times below the
live value. This shows that a negative long-range tail or a negative
(Q=0) sign is not by itself a binding criterion; it is still not a real
NN/deuteron calculation. See the formal S-wave threshold
audit.
A separate source-free vacuum check finds the listed minimal-sector tree-level two-body cuts (\sigma\to N\bar N), (A\to N\bar N), and (\sigma\to AA) kinematically closed at the live masses. This is only the absence of those intrinsic vacuum widths in the displayed action fragment; it is not a lifetime, Q, dark-matter, device, or all-orders stability prediction. See the minimal vacuum-closure audit.
The source-free local Abelian-Higgs subsector also has (\beta=m_\sigma^2/m_A^2=2.53003\ldots>1), hence a type-II, non-BPS parameter ratio. This is a conditional mathematical direction only: without an explicit compact-U(1), charge-lattice, and global-boundary completion it does not establish a physically protected vortex or string. The branch and its BVP are recorded in the conditional vortex-sector audit.
For the generator branch, see the practical energy audit producer, semantic tests, deterministic JSON, and Russian report. It is a zero-weight utility/non-evidence audit: unsupported vacuum/CISS/over-unity paths are rejected, while only a configurable conventional waste-heat Seebeck model is retained.
Preprints: Published titles and links are retained as a historical bibliography. Their conclusions are not automatically results of the current executable model.
-
Lattice Sigma Terms as an Anchor for the Dense Nuclear Matter Equation of State
-
Analytic Derivation of the Dense Matter Equation of State and Maximum Neutron Star Mass via QCD Vacuum Condensate Phase Transitions
-
Geometric Truncation of Low-Multipole CMB Power and Null B-Mode Prediction from a QCD-Scale Euclidean Instanton Bounce
-
A Discrete Cyclic Mass Hierarchy 4^N for Primordial Black Holes: Bridging Asteroid-Mass Dark Matter to Early JWST Heavy Seeds
-
Resolution of the Slow-Rotating Magnetar Paradox via QCD Vacuum Permeability Phase Transitions
-
Eliminating the Observer Effect: Wave Function Collapse as Deterministic Topological Reconnection in a Condensate Vacuum
-
Neutron Star Structure from a Single QCD Parameter: Equation of State, Tidal Deformability, and Cooling Threshold in the Null-Vector Gravity Framework Historical publication bundle (not current runtime evidence). The maintained code exposes a hyperon-threshold proxy, raw RMF comparisons, and a calibrated cooling threshold; a complete beta-equilibrated EOS and independent likelihood are not implemented, so no hyperon-puzzle resolution is claimed.
-
Dynamics of the QCD Vacuum Condensate Amplitude in Dense Matter and Cosmology Historical proposal for radial-field dynamics and an FLRW melting/bounce interpretation near
$n_B\approx2.05,n_0$ . The maintained source-complete action instead has positive vector energy diverging as$W^{-2}$ at fixed nonzero baryon density, so that density-melting/bounce claim is not supported by the current model. -
Seven Results of the Vacuum Condensate: From Nuclear Matter to Quantum Mechanics Historical collection of Madelung, stochastic-electrodynamics and Einstein–Cartan proposals. Fourier uncertainty identities and illustrative standard-formula calculations do not derive quantum measurement, Hawking radiation or a cosmological bounce from the maintained source-complete action; that action includes no torsion sector.
-
Resolution of the Hyperon Puzzle via QCD Vacuum Condensate Melting in the NVG/VMF Framework Historical publication bundle (not current runtime evidence). It describes a proposed hyperonic phase-transition model; the maintained repository does not provide the independent EOS construction/likelihood needed to call this an empirical resolution.
The latest calculation and derivation (Russian)
move beyond finite droplets to the homogeneous cold-matter model. For a
regular positive power-law potential U ~ a W^p, constant positive couplings
and the stated minimum/regularity assumptions,
lim(P/epsilon) = lim(dP/depsilon) = max(1/3, (p-2)/(p+2)).
An explicit positive deformation preserves the vacuum and calibration
potential derivatives through order three but changes the formal tail limit
from 3/5 to 7/9. The first local distinguishing coefficients are
Delta Z = 2.1207879107 MeV and 0.04849382613 MeV for the two declared
calibrated examples. These are within-model mathematical results, not a
universal law, measurements, a new physical interaction, or a bounce proof.
Reproduce the five-case/35-state calculation and its 13 focused tests
with mpmath installed:
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python -B verification/nvg_density_universality_audit.py
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 PYTHONPATH=verification python -B -m unittest verification.test_nvg_density_universality_audit -vThe program computes its output afresh and rejects corrupted numerical
evidence. See the frozen contract
for assumptions and the research directions
for the full idea selection. The shared BulkModel/inverse_potential_jet
API is included as a dependency; the separate upstream audit CLI is outside
this focused workflow.
The static W8.93 branch (no rho, s* = 0.2268, Ca40 anchor) was extended through a pre-registered chain of finite-nucleus probes: isovector contact with form factor, the held-out Ca48 test, and the four-nucleus discriminating set {Zr90, Pb208, Ca48, Sn132}. Verdict: UNIVERSAL_CONSTANT_SUPPORTED — a single bulk isovector constant j = 11.14 MeV (J_design = 23.78 MeV) collapses the binding-energy residual 202.7 -> -3.4 MeV (~60x) with anchor drift -0.04%; the four tangents span 10.44-12.38 MeV (mean 11.136 MeV).
The follow-up identification audit shows what this constant is: the interaction part of the classical nuclear symmetry energy — the 1935 Bethe-Weizsacker asymmetry term, equal in the zero-range limit to the rho-meson channel of QHD:
| Model quantity | Value | Literature match | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| T_CONTACT = k_F^2/(6 E_F) | 12.644 MeV | Fermi-gas kinetic symmetry energy | band 11.0-13.0 |
| J_design = T + j | 23.780 MeV | LDM a_sym 22.90-23.7 MeV | +0.3...+3.9% |
| j (interaction piece) | 11.136 MeV | a_sym - T_kin = 10.9-11.4 MeV | within 2.5% |
| implied g_rho (tau/2) | 6.60 | published RMF range 4.1-6.8 | inside |
No new particle or force is claimed. The new element is the method: an isoscalar core measuring the symmetry-energy interaction part blind, with pre-registration, at 1-3% accuracy. Radii/skins remain outside the static branch (shell physics); adopting the isovector term as a theory element is a pending author decision; all these audits carry evidence_weight = 0.
The closing transferability probe tests the constant from both sides. Part A: a secant re-anchoring of s* on Ca40 under the rho contact gives ds/s = -0.041% (s*_rho = 0.2267063) — verdict REANCHORED_UNIVERSAL_J_SURVIVES, the residual collapse 202.7 -> -2.6 MeV survives a clean recalibration of the anchor. Part B: the canonical NS chain is one-component (isoscalar EOS — the rho term cannot enter it), and transferring j = 11.136 MeV into the two-component saturated-vector family (C_rho -> 2j/n0 = 139.2 MeV fm^3) yields realistic J = 29.0 / L = 85 MeV and RAISES M_max 2.048 -> 2.095 Msun (verdict TRANSFERABLE_TO_NS_SECTOR), but breaks the secondary screening bands (R_1.4 = 13.45 km > 13.2; Lambda_tilde ~ 940/870 > 720): the mechanism is the tied saturation calibration compensating the softer isospin by raising c_omega0 (1794 -> 2074), stiffening the EOS. Conclusion: j is not a freely transferable drop-in constant — the NS family would require re-selection, not a single substitution.
That re-selection is now done: the pre-registered soft-isospin re-selection scan (3150-point grid over the isoscalar family shape and transition parameters at C_rho = 2j/n0) answers in two stages. Stage 1 (transition parameters alone at the baseline isoscalar shape): 0 of 42 survivors — drop-in re-selection cannot absorb the shift. Stage 2 (full family): 75 survivors, verdict SOFT_ISOSPIN_SURVIVOR_FOUND. Best point k1 = 0.20, k2 = 0.60, Cs = 900, n_tr = 1.8, de = 0.10: M_max = 2.0405 Msun, R_1.4 = 12.588 km, Lambda_tilde = 634/624 (margin +0.431, binding: GW170817), UNIQUE_STABLE_BRANCH, confirmed at 120-point resolution; the surviving region is a wide plateau (k1 in {0.20, 0.25}) rather than a fine-tuned needle. A mildly faster scalar-mass decay (k1 0.25 -> 0.20) compensates the isospin-driven stiffening and restores all three bands while keeping the identified j — one constant, both sectors, within the family (conditional, in-sample, evidence_weight = 0).
The first genuinely external test — the PREX-II/CREX consistency probe — then compares the point neutron skins of Pb208/Ca48 on both branches against the published two-sigma bands (pre-registered; neither j nor s* was ever tuned to a skin). Verdict: SKINS_EXCLUDED_BOTH_BRANCHES (Pb208: -5.1 sigma no_rho / -4.4 sigma identified_j; Ca48: -3.4 / -2.8 sigma). The plane-wave F_W and A_PV run high by the same compactness deficit, and the naive contact strength the skins would require (58-72 MeV) is ~5x the identified j. This cleanly separates the bulk energy channel (where j works at 1-3%) from the surface/shell channel (direction IV): the exclusion confirms the documented boundary of the static TF branch rather than failing the constant (evidence_weight = 0).
Reproduce the probes, the identification, the transferability, the re-selection and the external-consistency probe (141 focused tests total):
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python -B verification/nvg_sn132_discriminating_set_probe.py
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python -B verification/nvg_j_identification_audit.py
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python -B verification/nvg_isovector_transferability_probe.py
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python -B verification/nvg_soft_isospin_ns_reselection_probe.py
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python -B verification/nvg_prex_crex_external_consistency_probe.py
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 PYTHONPATH=verification python -B -m unittest \
verification.test_nvg_sn132_discriminating_set_probe \
verification.test_nvg_j_identification_audit \
verification.test_nvg_isovector_transferability_probe \
verification.test_nvg_soft_isospin_ns_reselection_probe \
verification.test_nvg_prex_crex_external_consistency_probe -vContracts: nuclear isospin jet, nuclear closure. Reports: isovector form-factor probe, Ca48 held-out probe, discriminating set, j identification, isovector transferability, soft-isospin re-selection, PREX/CREX consistency. The full scientific front door (registry validation with 512 entries, predictive ledger, canonical suite, 1120 semantic tests) is green at this state.
This repository contains theoretical proposals, numerical models, diagnostic audits and illustrative experiments for Null-Vector Gravity (NVG) and the Vacuum Mass Fraction (VMF) program. Their implementation and evidence status differ; the source-complete model and its limits are documented above.
The historical mass-budget convention assigns about 91% of the nucleon mass to the remainder after subtracting adopted sigma-term contributions. The quoted
The following schematic action summarizes historical extensions. Its electromagnetic/topological terms do not establish the three research directions below as consequences of the maintained source-complete action, whose normalization, matter coupling and Gauss constraint are specified in the model document.
where
-
Scalar amplitude (
$\mathcal W$ ): The historical proposal links suppression of the field to dense-matter and cosmological effects. In the current fixed-density homogeneous action, complete melting at nonzero density is excluded by the positive$W^{-2}$ vector term; singularity resolution does not follow. -
Phase and topological-flow proposals (
$\theta$ ): A timelike phase gradient and a$\theta F\tilde F$ interaction can be posited in an extension. Emergent time and magnetar amplification require specified dynamics and matching; the gauge phase of the maintained Higgs sector is not an additional physical Goldstone oscillator.
The linked preprint develops a field ansatz and a proposed connection to QCD sigma terms. It does not supply the missing operator matching, parameter uncertainties or a derivation of the cosmological correction
For the historical derivation and assumptions, see NVG_VACUUM_W_FIELD_DERIVATION_EN.md.
The repository retains three research directions with separate assumptions and validation boundaries:
The historical melting-based EOS program (see Zenodo 20463836) and the canonical calibrated TOV chain are distinct from the current source-complete one-component EOS. The maintained runtime surfaces:
- Compute a hyperon threshold proxy and raw NL3+Lambda curves. A complete beta-equilibrated hyperonic EOS and independent likelihood are not implemented, so no puzzle resolution is claimed.
- Compute a calibrated Direct-Urca cooling threshold. The threshold is an in-sample calibration, not an independent cooling-population confirmation.
-
Computes a canonical conditional neutron-star chain (runtime
$M_{\max}=2.048,M_\odot$ , with a CSS branch at$c_s^2=1/3$ ; transition parameters are selected in-sample and are not independent evidence). -
Computes the canonical tidal chain and a transform-only I-Love-Q visualization. The plotted
$I(\Lambda)$ and$Q(\Lambda)$ points apply the Yagi–Yunes fits to runtime$\Lambda$ values; no independent moment-of-inertia or quadrupole solve is present, so this is not an EOS-universality test. The canonical transition is selected in-sample from J0740, GW170817, and NICER constraints; downstream NS comparisons are conditional/in-sample, not independent confirmations (verification/nvg_iloveq_plot.py; runtime report). -
Use the adopted
$859$ MeV mass-budget scale alongside declared couplings and EOS calibration parameters; no elimination of parameter degeneracy or independent lattice calibration of$W_0$ is established. - Provides a forward
$\rho$ -meson mass/line-shape template for FAIR/HADES; no event likelihood is present.
The historical cosmology assigns
Conditional bounce ansatz: Historical calculations use the modified Friedmann equation below. Its negative quadratic term is an additional assumption; the current source-complete action provides no derived FLRW or Einstein–Cartan torsion completion that generates it. Algebraic evaluation of this equation is not a derivation of the bounce mechanism.
Here rho is mass-equivalent energy density, with no separately added Lambda. This conditional flat case now has an exact solution and independent integration through the bounce. Its pressure is constrained by conservation: epsilon_eff=F(epsilon) requires P_eff=(epsilon+P)Fprime-F. The modification is still not derived from the NVG action. Equations, checks and limitations (Russian).
Conditional scales computed from this ansatz and its declared inputs:
| Quantity | Value | Derivation |
|---|---|---|
| Assigned energy-density scale |
|
|
| Scale comparison only | ||
| Bounce timescale |
|
|
| Bounce temperature |
432 MeV | Stefan-Boltzmann QGP ( |
| Holographic entropy (Universe) | ||
| CMB/BAO |
Historical ansatz estimate; no CMB/BAO likelihood validation |
Genesis Phase — The First Cycle: The historical Genesis construction assumes a Euclidean instanton, Hartle–Hawking-type boundary conditions and a starting point at the assigned density with zero expansion rate. Under those assumptions its radius is:
This gives an initial mass of only
Tolman's Entropy Snowball: The cycle-growth scenario assumes that entropy production survives a bounce and enlarges subsequent cycles. Neither the transfer mechanism nor a measured cycle count is supplied by the equilibrium action. Its illustrative sequence is:
-
Cycle 1:
$r_c \approx 1.13$ km, lifetime $\sim 5.9,\mu$s -
Assigned element 77 (76 mass doublings): the shared producer gives
$M\approx5.7393\times10^{55}$ g and a conditional scale$\pi GM/c^3\approx14.1592$ Byr. This is neither an observed cycle nor time remaining to turnaround; the former 24.7 Byr does not follow from these inputs.
CMB Low-$\ell$ Prediction:
The finite instanton size
A separate Hayward-metric ansatz uses a regular de Sitter core with
Dynamical boundary: A de Sitter-like stress or a regular metric does not by itself show that collapsing matter reaches that state. The maintained action does not derive the proposed melting transition, a stable inner horizon or a unitary evolution through a bounce. Those require separate dynamical and stability calculations.
Information-transfer hypotheses: The following ideas remain proposals; metric regularity alone does not establish quantum unitarity:
- Holographic compression: the quoted
$\sim10^{32}$ factor is model bookkeeping, not a derived information-conservation law. - Unitary transfer:
$\mathcal I_{n+1}=\mathcal U_b\mathcal I_n$ names an assumed map; its operator and dynamics are not constructed. - Two horizons and finite curvature do not prove the absence of information loss or inner-horizon instabilities.
Conditional echo scales: A reflective-core template gives
EHT scope: The historical benchmark quotes a photon-sphere deviation of
The tables mix historical proposals, assumed scales, calibrated outputs and mathematical checks. They do not describe a single parameter-free model: the mass-budget scale, couplings, EOS choices, cosmological normalizations and extension-specific inputs have distinct provenance. For the sake of scientific rigor, the results are divided into: direct unique predictions, consistency checks (null tests), and falsifiable forecasts.
These rows summarize declared runtime calculations, formal identities, conditional comparisons, and forecasts; they are not an aggregate confirmation count.
Status legend: ✅ compatible with data · 📏 interval prediction · 🔭 forward prediction (no measurement yet) · ⚙️ calibration / consistency check · ⚪ null test · 📐 mathematical result (not an experimental confirmation) · ❓ conjectural · ❌ open problem / retracted · ⏳ awaiting experiment. Falsifiable rows state the measurement that would exclude the model. Statuses are per-row. The global-significance entry point computes descriptive conditional pulls but withholds any global p-value because no traceable held-out producer exists; the README table is presentation metadata, not a source of statistics. NS values below are runtime outputs of the canonical TOV chain and all comparisons are conditional/in-sample with zero independent evidence weight. Provenance note:
| # | NVG Prediction | Observational Data | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Historical nucleon mass-budget remainder: about 91% ( |
Computed after subtracting adopted sigma-term inputs, including |
⚙️ Input convention; not an independent confirmation |
| 2 |
|
PSR J0740+6620: |
⚙️ Conditional/in-sample |
| 3 |
|
NICER J0030: |
⚙️ Conditional/in-sample |
| 4 | Genesis Instanton |
|
📏 Interval prediction |
| 5 | NS cooling dichotomy via a direct-Urca threshold at |
Cas A (slow) vs Vela (fast): the two-regime cooling is reproduced (nvg_direct_urca.py) | ⚙️ Calibrated threshold |
| 6 | Tidal deformability: runtime |
GW170817 declared input: |
⚙️ Conditional/in-sample |
| 7 | Historical in-medium |
Repository selector windows and conditional feasibility ( |
🔭 Conditional line-shape forecast |
| 8 | Assigned cosmological density scale |
Dimensional scale from the adopted mass input. The negative-density correction and torsion completion are not derived from the maintained action; an algebraic H=0 point does not validate collapse/bounce dynamics. | ❓ Historical bounce ansatz |
| 9 | Hubble constant: cycle-77 turnaround horizons bound |
SH0ES ( |
📏 Interval prediction |
| 10 | Surface gravitational redshift: |
Direct measurements are currently absent; this is a forward calculation testable by STROBE-X/eXTP (nvg_ns_redshift.py) | 🔭 Forward prediction |
| 11 | Historical-template instantaneous mass-shift hierarchy at |
HADES, CBM (FAIR), NICA, LHC in-medium invariant-mass spectra (fair_hades_link.py) | ⏳ Pending verification |
| 12 | Cosmic bounce temperature: |
Conditional thermodynamic scale for the assigned density and |
⚙️ Conditional scale |
| 13 | Effective vacuum dielectric constant: |
Amplifies magnetar seed fields by |
⚙️ Scale estimate |
| 14 | Legacy relic calibration inversion | A legacy, undocumented Omega_DM=0.268 and H0=72.8 are supplied to infer |
⚙️ Calibration only; no abundance prediction |
| 15 | NS core speed of sound: the quark phase follows a CSS ansatz with |
Compatible with joint NICER+LIGO posterior limits (speed_of_sound_curve.py) | ⚪ Ansatz parameter |
| 16 | First cycle duration: |
A timescale assigned through |
⚙️ Conditional timescale |
| 17 | Joint NS comparison: conditional/in-sample reduced |
Runtime outputs |
⚙️ Conditional/in-sample |
| 18 | Scalar Glueball mass: |
Lightest scalar glueball ( |
✅ Compatible with lattice (experiment unsettled) |
| 19 | Historical bounce GW template: anchor |
|
🔭 $\mu$Hz forward prediction |
| 20 | Strong-Field Periastron Advance & PPN Parameters | NVG vacuum polarization correction is |
✅ Within Observational Limits |
| 21 | JWST SMBH Mass Spectrum (z = 6–15) | A conditional growth template can be evaluated for a selected mass rung, but no machine-readable JWST object catalogue, occupation model, or selection likelihood is present | ❌ Retired (missing catalogue/likelihood) |
| 22 | FRB DM Population Statistics | No repeater-linked DM/magnetar-mass catalogue or population likelihood is present; the former synthetic KS comparison is retired | ❌ Retired (missing catalogue/likelihood) |
| 23 | Higgsless Proton-to-Pion Mass Ratio | Baryon/pion mass ratio ( |
📐 Mass-budget/chiral-limit illustration |
| 24 | QCD Phase Diagram Vacuum Melting | Vacuum melting boundary at |
❓ Assumed phase-boundary template |
| 25 | PTA-LIGO O4 SGWB Cross-Correlation | Primordial SGWB turn-down at |
🔭 Conditional spectral template; no joint likelihood |
| 26 | NICER radii near |
Runtime canonical chain gives |
⚙️ Conditional/in-sample |
| 27 | CMB Temperature |
The result scales linearly with the arbitrary normalization |
⚪ No predictive content |
| 28 | Baryon asymmetry | A bounded-temperature no-go argument is retained as a formal result, but no baryon-number/CP-violating source, washout network, or independent abundance likelihood is implemented; the former empirical cogenesis closure is retired (nvg_baryon_asymmetry.py) | 📐 Formal no-go; empirical closure retired |
| 29 | Post-merger peak frequency |
Derived from runtime |
🔭 Forward prediction |
| 30 | Quiescent temperature of SGR 1935+2154 | With the heating luminosity set near the observed value and a typical spot size, |
⚙️ Consistency illustration |
| 31 | LiteBIRD B-mode Polarization Cutoff | predicted tensor-to-scalar ratio |
🔭 Assumed cutoff forecast |
| 32 |
|
Open problem. The maintained calculation gives |
|
| 33 | NANOGrav SGWB | Retired attribution. The maintained PBH abundance cross-check leaves a large amplitude deficit and the bounce calculation radiates in the $\mu$Hz band; NVG supplies no mechanism for the PTA signal (nvg_nanograv_background.py) | ❌ Retired (no mechanism) |
| 34 | Higgs boson mass shift |
Propagator mass shift |
⚙️ Assumed-coupling scale; no collider likelihood |
| 35 | PBH ladder / profile peak | The discrete mass ladder is the declared |
⚙️ Ladder mapping; abundance unnormalized |
| 36 | White Dwarf cooling age shift | Predicted effect |
⚪ Null test (unobservably small) |
| 37 | Neutron star core g-modes | Runtime WKB forecast over an assumed composition grid gives periods in a 50–150 ms sensitivity band; no detector likelihood or confirmation is available (nvg_ns_g_modes.py) | 🔭 Forecast (assumed composition) |
| 38 | SN1987A dark-photon sensitivity scan | The current reference scan includes a 19.8% mass-drop point with |
⚙️ Conditional scan (no evidence) |
| 39 | de Sitter core standing waves | Constant-density standing-wave toy model with $T_1\approx42,\mu$s for a |
🔭 Conditional toy spectrum |
| 40 | Conditional strong-CP potential | The minimum of an added |
📐 Conditional potential identity |
| 41 | Arrow of Time from Topology | Illustration of a selected phase winding |
📐 Synthetic illustration |
| 42 | Double-slit interference from vacuum hydrodynamics | $ | \psi |
| 43 | LZ 248-keV nuclear-recoil screen | An exact two-body screen with a derived bound-SHM envelope v_max<=824.355 km/s excludes an elastic path for the bound action's 0.783-GeV vector and 1.245-GeV scalar modes, as well as the legacy 0.938-GeV χ and 1.229-GeV W proxy; a new elastic candidate must be at least 70.659 GeV. The action does not establish any of these light modes as a cold halo population. This is a necessary condition, not a likelihood or exclusion of all NVG variants (nvg_lz_248kev_kinematic_audit.py, Russian audit) |
⚙️ Kinematic screen; LZ is not explained by the current model |
| 44 | Bell-CHSH correlations in the condensate | The correlation form |
📐 Resolved: representation, not derivation |
| 45 | Heisenberg uncertainty |
|
📐 Standard identity; synthetic examples |
| 46 | Phase-thermalization illustration | The toy estimate |
❓ Measurement mechanism unclosed |
| 47 | Neutrino mass from θ-seesaw | Separate scale ansatz |
❓ Extension-specific scale ansatz |
| 48 | Hawking-formula illustration | Computes the standard |
📐 Synthetic illustration |
| 49 | Fine structure constant: physical-cutoff interpretation | Recomputed with |
⚙️ Reinterpretation (no independent prediction) |
| 50 | Antimatter as |
C-conjugation and phase reversal are formal identities. The maintained baryogenesis calculation is retired because no baryon-number/CP-violating source dynamics or washout likelihood is implemented (nvg_baryon_asymmetry.py) | 📐 Formal identity; baryogenesis retired |
| 51 | 🔥 RHIC Bell Test — entanglement death |
|
⏳ Awaiting RHIC BES-II |
| 52 | Homochirality from QCD topology | A QCD-to-molecular PVED coupling, reaction kinetics, and independent chirality likelihood are absent; the former |
❌ Retired (missing coupling/likelihood) |
| 53 | Primordial Gravitational Waves (BICEP/Keck) | Historical Genesis dimensional estimate |
❓ Conditional dimensional estimate |
| 54 | Critical Horizon Mass | The quoted |
🔭 Conditional metric prediction |
| 55 | Hawking Temperature Ceiling | For the stationary Hayward ansatz with |
🔭 Conditional stationary-metric calculation |
5. Inner-Horizon Saturation & Area Deficit:
Scanning the horizon roots of the Hayward metric as
These entries record model interpretations and possible research directions. They do not establish solutions of the underlying physical problems.
| Area | NVG Interpretation | Impact on Physics |
|---|---|---|
| Origin of Magnetars | The quoted reconstructed correlation |
Reconstruction, coupling and saturation assumptions require independent tests; no resolution of the |
| PBH Mass Spectrum | A conditional ladder maps assumed bounce-mass growth per cycle from |
This scale map does not supply formation, abundance or object-level JWST likelihoods; it does not establish a dark-matter or early-BH explanation. |
| JWST SMBH Seeding | A conditional PBH mass-rung growth template can be evaluated for a selected cycle. | Object-level JWST seeding is retired: no machine-readable catalogue, occupation model, or selection likelihood is present. |
| Joint Multi-Messenger Inference | Conditional/in-sample reduced |
The transition was selected using J0740, NICER, and GW170817 inputs, so this is descriptive and carries zero independent evidence weight. |
| Emergent Quantization & Duality | Madelung variables rewrite a wavefunction using amplitude and phase; the quantum potential |
A representation of assumed quantum dynamics is not a derivation of the Schrödinger equation from the maintained classical action. |
| Observer Effect | Phase thermalization and topological reconnection are proposed illustrations. | No Born-rule derivation, outcome-selection law or resolution of the measurement problem is supplied. |
NVG must not break General Relativity where it works reliably. These items summarize formal/process checks and declared comparisons; they do not prove empirical agreement or replace a detector likelihood.
| Physical Aspect | NVG Prediction | Observational Data |
|---|---|---|
| EOS Causality |
|
The causal condition |
| Gravitational Waves |
|
Cassini, GW170817: $ |
| External BH Metric | A chosen exterior/regular-core metric provides a formal comparison | No independent merger-waveform likelihood establishes exact Kerr/Schwarzschild equivalence |
| Tidal Deformability | Runtime canonical |
GW170817 declared input: |
| Dark Energy (DESI) |
Retired mechanism. The mass-melting derivation of |
|
| BH Shadows (EHT) | Historical |
Not a sourced EHT fit or a portable bound for the source-complete action |
| Lorentz Invariance |
|
GRB 041219A / 090510 (Fermi/Swift) |
| QNM Ringdown | Historical |
No derived perturbation spectrum or detector likelihood establishes this number for the maintained macroscopic core |
| CMB |
Assumed cutoff approaches the baseline at high multipoles | The maintained lite comparison is not the Planck likelihood and cannot establish an exact data match |
| BBN and Recombination | Historical estimates |
A small correction estimate does not replace nucleosynthesis/recombination calculations or validate the quoted |
The highest-risk testable forecasts of the theory. Future measurements can constrain or falsify these channels; none is a current confirmation.
| Direction | Forecasted Value / Interpretation | Experiment / Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| CMB Anomaly |
Assumed Genesis cutoff is a candidate template; cosmic variance is not eliminated | No traceable Planck likelihood establishes its origin; future data could compare specified alternatives |
| In-medium |
Preregistered architecture selector: fitted in-medium pole |
HADES in-medium analysis announced for 2026–27 |
| Gravitational Echo | Echo spacing |
Searched O1–O4b open data (coherent time-slide, 89 events): no evidence, upper limit set (echoes |
| NS Gravitational Redshift |
|
STROBE-X / eXTP (future X-ray observatories) |
| Post-merger |
|
LIGO O5 / Einstein Telescope (future detectors) |
| Vacuum melting exponent |
|
RHIC BES-II net-proton cumulant scaling near NVG_MELTING_LAW_ANALYSIS.md
|
The repository records an outreach proposal to the HADES Collaboration (GSI/FAIR, Prof. Dr. J. Stroth) concerning Au+Au and Ag+Ag dielectron data; this is not a collaboration result or endorsement. Historical model values
Maintained runtime entry points expose conditional comparisons, calibrations, forward models, and retired claims against declared data inputs; a process run is not observational verification:
-
Hubble Constant (
$H_0$ ): Cycle-77 turnaround horizons bound$H_0 \in [54.3, 108.5]$ km/s/Mpc with a mid-cycle value$\approx 76.8$ (within 5% of SH0ES); the point value$72.8$ is set by the local measurement, and a quantitative CMB re-fit shows the Genesis IR cutoff does not shift the CMB-inferred$H_0$ — the tension is not resolved by this mechanism (verification/nvg_cmb_lowl_refit.py). -
Weak Lensing
$S_8$ : Open problem. The maintained calculation gives$S_8 \approx 0.851$ ($4.4\sigma$ from lensing): the input-dependent$w_0/w_a$ shift slightly increases growth, and the former empirical drag-factor resolution route is retired (verification/nvg_s8_tension_check.py). -
CMB Low-$\ell$ Suppression: The maintained calculation reports a descriptive lite-likelihood comparison over vendored, unknown-provenance Planck-shaped arrays (not the Planck likelihood):
$\ell_c = 3.42$ and default$\chi^2$ /gain values are model bookkeeping, not a Planck p-value or independent confirmation. The cutoff shape comparison remains descriptive (verification/nvg_cmb_lowl_refit.py,verification/nvg_cutoff_shape_derivation.py). -
DESI 2024 Dark Energy
$w(z)$ : Retired claim. The mass-melting$(w_0, w_a)$ derivation was frame-dependent: CMB-anchored, it yields effective$(-0.813, -0.909)$ — a marginal$\Delta\chi^2 \approx 1$ over $\Lambda$CDM — while pushing$S_8$ to$\approx 0.86$ –$0.90$; the joint map excludes the whole$(\beta, a_{\rm on})$ grid (verification/nvg_desi_s8_joint_map.py). NVG's dark sector currently predicts$w = -1$ , and the DESI dynamical-DE hint stands as an open challenge to the model. -
GW170817 Tidal Deformability: The runtime canonical EOS yields
$\Lambda_{1.4}=519.4$ (and a conditional binary calculation), compared with the declared GW170817 interval$[70,720]$ . The transition was selected on this constraint, so no independent confirmation is claimed. - Young Neutron Star Cooling: The maintained route exposes a calibrated Direct-Urca threshold, but no independent cooling-population likelihood is implemented; the old object-level match is not evidence.
- JWST Early SMBH Seeding: A mass-rung growth template remains available, but object-level JWST seeding is retired pending a machine-readable catalogue, occupation model, and selection likelihood.
-
Pulsar Population Dichotomy: The former ATNF/mock-population claim is retired; no mass/age/luminosity likelihood is present (
verification/nvg_pulsar_population_test.py). -
GW Echo Matched Filtering: The maintained route computes a real-GWTC mass-only forward delay; no strain likelihood or matched-filter detection claim is made (
verification/nvg_new_directions_verification.py). -
LiteBIRD B-mode Polarization: Predicts tensor-to-scalar ratio
$r < 0.001$ at CMB scales ($\ell < 10$ ) due to the Genesis cutoff, serving as a template check for the 2032 LiteBIRD mission (verification/nvg_litebird_prediction.py). -
NICER PSR J0437-4715 Radius: The runtime canonical radius is
$R\approx12.55$ km, a$+1.5\sigma$ conditional pull against the 2024 NICER measurement ($11.36 \pm 0.8$ km at$1.418 M_\odot$ ). The transition was selected in-sample; this is not an independent confirmation (verification/nvg_nicer_j0437_check.py). -
NANOGrav 15yr SGWB: Retired claim. The two-population analysis (
verification/nvg_pbh_two_population.py) shows the JWST-calibrated heavy-PBH population falls$\sim 1{,}700\times$ short of the NANOGrav strain, and the bounce radiates at$18$ –$42,\mu$Hz — NVG offers no mechanism for the PTA signal. -
Hubble Constant (interval form): The cycle-quantized horizon chain (
$n=77 \to N_e \in [52.68, 53.38] \to H_0$ ) gives the interval and mid-cycle values above; note that$N_e = 53.08$ , the CMB low-$\ell$ cutoff scale and the point$H_0$ all trace to the SAME single calibration against the local$H_0$ — one fitted parameter, not three independent confirmations (verification/nvg_hubble_tension.py). -
SGR 1935+2154 FRBs: Computes a mass-to-rate sensitivity scaling; no burst-rate catalogue or population likelihood is implemented, so the
$>3\times$ contrast is not an observed confirmation (verification/nvg_sgr_frb_rate.py). -
S8 (duplicate of the bullet above): see the honest accounting — computed
$S_8 \approx 0.851$ ,$4.4\sigma$ from lensing, open problem (verification/nvg_s8_tension_check.py). -
CHIME Repeating FRBs: Retired pending a repeater-linked DM/magnetar-mass catalogue and defensible population likelihood; no synthetic p-value or confirmation is reported (
verification/nvg_chime_frb_check.py). -
LIGO O4 Echo Candidates: Predicts echo delays in the
$0.021 - 0.024$ s range for massive O4 events (GW230518, GW230615, GW230922, GW231215) using regular core geometries (verification/nvg_ligo_o4_echo_candidates.py). -
Advanced Calculations: Emits a runtime evidence-status ledger for formal/forward rows and explicitly retired JWST, FRB, PTA, and neutrino claims; a process run is not observational verification (
verification/nvg_advanced_calculations.py). -
Vacuum Melting Law
$W(\rho)$ — Identifiability & Critical Exponent: A focused, reproducible study of what the melting law is actually measured by, using the framework's own forward models (NVG_MELTING_LAW_ANALYSIS.md). The deep-core identifiability study uses an alternate dated calibration and is descriptive only (zero independent evidence weight); it must not be confused with the runtime canonical chain. The cosmological$\sqrt{1-\rho/\rho_c}$ law is inert at NS density, while a QCD-anchored 3-D critical point gives$\beta\approx0.326$ (verification/nvg_melting_freeform_beta.py,verification/nvg_melting_identifiability.py,verification/nvg_melting_exponent.py).
A maintained set of scripts in verification/ computes formal identities, conditional model outputs, and forward forecasts. Each entry point exposes its evidence boundary; a successful process run is not an observational confirmation.
Per the contract NVG_RESEARCH_CONTRACT.md (SPEC-v2), compatibility with data is never labelled “proof”; the tiers below are the maximum an honest audit may claim:
| Tier | Content | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| I. Exact identities within definitions |
|
Algebra and units; not measurements of a bounce or field |
| II. Conditional extension maps | The separate |
Shared parameter dependence is not independent evidence; no matching to the source-complete action is supplied |
| III. Conditional compatibilities |
|
declared data inputs; NS chain selected in-sample, with zero independent evidence weight (SPEC-v2 C3) |
| IV. Calibrations (not evidence) |
|
one fitted input per block |
| V. Conjectures (CONJECTURED) | the |
ansatz + shared SPEC-v2 rejection boundary item 2) |
Algebraic identities check the stated definitions; conditional maps check their chosen assumptions. Neither is empirical confirmation. The triple-hierarchy identities (nvg_dual_hierarchy_identity.py) also use calibrated Hubble input, so their closure is a consistency check.
| Script | Result | Status |
|---|---|---|
nvg_anchor_identities.py |
6 closed identities from the single input |
PASS + |
nvg_cmb_birefringence.py |
Cosmic birefringence from |
forward null test (LiteBIRD |
nvg_moment_of_inertia_j0737.py |
Hartle slow-rotation exploratory calculation; its alternate EOS outputs are dated calibration diagnostics, not the maintained canonical chain | zero independent evidence weight; future J0737A measurement remains a forecast |
nvg_theta_fifth_force.py |
|
tension diagnostic |
nvg_neutrinoless_dbeta.py |
|
forward null test |
nvg_spin_limits_rmodes.py |
Exploratory fork-B Kepler/r-mode limits (dated alternate calibration); these outputs are not the maintained canonical NS chain | descriptive diagnostic; zero independent evidence weight |
nvg_theta_superradiance.py |
|
forward null test |
nvg_tidal_heating_null.py |
Tidal heating: GW phase deficit ~32 cycles (EMRI, LISA) for a Kerr BH vs 0 for a horizonless remnant | forward null test |
nvg_de_axion_crosscheck.py |
Cross-check against the dark-dimension window (0.2–100 μm): |
CONJECTURED diagnostic (SPEC-v2) |
nvg_dual_hierarchy_identity.py |
Quad-hierarchy identity: |
closed identity (calibrated |
nvg_ns_mass_bound.py |
Parameter-free dimensional mass scale |
registered bound diagnostic; do not combine with fork-B or count as independent NS evidence |
nvg_sigma_mnu_corner.py |
The cornered |
dated-input sensitivity diagnostic |
nvg_katrin_mbeta.py |
Kinematic mass |
registered one-sided falsifier |
nvg_echo_o4_observers.py |
Observer card for the four O4 echo candidates (GW230518/230615/230922/231215): echo spacing |
observer card |
Historical conditional test proposals for separate extension sectors (not predictions established by the current source-complete action): (i) moment of inertia of J0737A — orbital precession of the double pulsar will measure
The historical optical exercise encoded selected NVG/VMF formula shapes as input signals and reported analog-channel measurements (γ=1.56, DR=86:1, SNR=38). These are input/output transfer comparisons, not measurements of nuclear matter or cosmological evolution.
| Test | NVG Prediction | Optical Result | Correlation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meson hierarchy |
|||
| Melting curve |
|
|
|
| Modified Friedmann |
Parabola, zeros at |
Encoded central maximum and endpoint zeros reproduced | |
| Tolman growth law | Conditional scaling check: adopting |
Algebraic consistency, not an optical measurement of cycles | — |
The quoted optical difference
Historical hypothesis checks: (i) the proposed “golden angle” /
Scope: this analog exercise checks selected signal shapes in its apparatus. It neither validates the physical model nor proves its complete mathematical structure; independent physical tests require appropriate data and a fully specified comparison model.
NVG-Research/
├── article/
│ ├── NVG_SCIENTIFIC_ARTICLE_EN.md # Pillar I: Dense Nuclear Matter (VMF)
│ ├── NVG_SCIENTIFIC_ARTICLE_RU.md # Russian version of Pillar I
│ ├── NVG_CYCLIC_COSMOLOGY_PREPRINT_EN.md # Pillar II: NVG Cyclic Cosmology
│ ├── NVG_CYCLIC_COSMOLOGY_PREPRINT_RU.md # Russian version
│ ├── NVG_GENESIS_MODEL_EN.md # Pillar II: The First Cycle
│ ├── NVG_GENESIS_MODEL_RU.md # Russian version
│ ├── NVG_MAGNETAR_PREPRINT_V3.md # Revised magnetar preprint with new quantitative closure tests
│ ├── NVG_MAGNETAR_PREPRINT_V3.tex # Publication LaTeX for the revised magnetar preprint
│ ├── NVG_MAGNETAR_PREPRINT_V3.pdf # Publication PDF for the revised magnetar preprint
│ ├── NVG_MAGNETAR_PREPRINT_V4.md # Version 4 preprint with mass correlation audit & predictions
│ ├── NVG_MAGNETAR_PREPRINT_V4.tex # LaTeX file for Version 4 preprint
│ ├── NVG_MAGNETAR_PREPRINT_V4.pdf # PDF for Version 4 preprint
│ ├── NVG_MAGNETAR_POPULATION_APPENDIX.md # Source-by-source magnetar population appendix
│ ├── NVG_UNIFIED_FIELD_EQUATIONS.md # Mathematical derivation of the unified field action and equations
│ ├── NVG_UNIFIED_FIELD_EQUATIONS.tex # LaTeX file for the unified field equations
│ ├── NVG_UNIFIED_FIELD_EQUATIONS.pdf # PDF for the unified field equations
│ ├── NVG_VACUUM_W_FIELD_DERIVATION_EN.md # QFT derivation of the vacuum condensate amplitude W (EN)
│ ├── NVG_VACUUM_W_FIELD_DERIVATION_RU.md # QFT derivation of the vacuum condensate amplitude W (RU)
│ └── *.pdf # PDF renders of all articles
├── verification/
│ ├── nvg_verification_suite.py # Master automated verification test suite
│ ├── nvg_advanced_calculations.py # Runtime evidence-status ledger; retired/forward rows remain non-evidence
│ ├── nvg_full_ns_eos.py # NS EOS + TOV solver → M_max, R_1.4
│ ├── nvg_hyperon_puzzle_solution.py # Hyperon threshold proxy (no complete-likelihood resolution)
│ ├── nvg_hyperon_puzzle_tov.py # TOV solver for Hyperon Puzzle (NL3/SLy baselines & figures)
│ ├── nvg_hadrons_magnetic_fields.py # Meson mass shifts, magnetic fields
│ ├── nvg_weak_field_ppn.py # PPN parameter verification (γ=1)
│ ├── nvg_cosmology_tensions.py # Hubble/S8 tensions, BBN constraints
│ ├── nvg_cooling_dark_matter.py # PBH Dark Matter, NS Cooling (Direct Urca)
│ ├── nvg_black_hole_entropy.py # BH core regularity, Tolman entropy balance
│ ├── nvg_cmb_smbh_cyclic.py # CMB anomalies, cyclic parameters, early SMBHs
│ ├── nvg_iloveq_gw_echoes.py # I-Love-Q transform, GW Echo templates
│ ├── nvg_bbn_reionization.py # BBN and reionization checks
│ ├── nvg_gravitational_waves_tests.py # Additional GW constraint checks
│ ├── nvg_advanced_observables_I.py # Runtime ledger: HADES forward, canonical NS chain, cycles
│ ├── nvg_advanced_observables_II.py # Runtime forward ledger: CMB/EHT/PBH (no likelihood)
│ ├── nvg_advanced_observables_III.py # Runtime ledger: mesons, Lorentz, cooling, QNM
│ ├── nvg_em_maxwell_decoherence.py # Maxwell equations (eps_eff) & Decoherence
│ ├── nvg_grmhd_surrogate.py # EOB surrogate BNS merger (GW Strain)
│ ├── nvg_detector_forward_model.py # HADES/CBM/NICA Forward Model
│ ├── nvg_pulsar_population_test.py # Retired: no ATNF mass/age/luminosity likelihood
│ ├── nvg_magnetar_closure.py # Magnetar closure checks and structural-amplification benchmarks
│ ├── nvg_1e161348_fallback_torque.py # Fallback-disk torque model for 1E 161348-5055
│ ├── nvg_magnetar_population_scan.py # Magnetar catalog scan, gamma-fit, and appendix export
│ ├── nvg_magnetar_mass_correlation.py # Reconstructed magnetar mass-field correlation statistical audit
│ ├── nvg_new_predictions.py # Quantitative multi-messenger predictions (FAIR, GW, LMXB)
│ ├── nvg_unified_field_equations.py # Verification of the unified field equations and core limits
│ ├── nvg_hades_dielectron_sim.py # HADES/CBM in-medium rho-meson dielectron spectral simulation
│ ├── nvg_gw_echo_waveforms.py # Post-merger black hole GW echoes waveform template simulator
│ ├── nvg_dark_energy_w0wa.py # CPL w0-wa parameter derivation from VMF cyclic cosmology
│ ├── nvg_dark_energy_desi.py # Cosmological dark energy w0-wa parameter alignment with DESI DR2
│ ├── nvg_pbh_jwst_seeds.py # JWST early supermassive black hole seeding puzzle simulation
│ ├── nvg_pbh_continuity_test.py # Continuous PBH mass spectrum
│ ├── nvg_joint_ns_inference.py # Joint NS Inference (Multi-Messenger Likelihood)
│ ├── nvg_observational_data_fit.py # Quantitative fits to Planck, DESI, GW170817, and cooling data
│ ├── nvg_new_directions_verification.py # Status ledger; JWST/ATNF retired, GW echo is mass-only forward
│ ├── nvg_litebird_prediction.py # B-mode polarization tensor cutoff predictions (LiteBIRD 2032)
│ ├── nvg_nicer_j0437_check.py # Mass-radius check against NICER 2024 PSR J0437-4715 bounds
│ ├── nvg_nanograv_background.py # Retired PBH–NANOGrav channel abundance cross-check
│ ├── nvg_hubble_tension.py # Hubble tension analysis and Genesis bounds
│ ├── nvg_sgr_frb_rate.py # Magnetar mass-stability relation and FRB rate for SGR 1935+2154
│ ├── nvg_s8_tension_check.py # Maintained S8 tension accounting (input-dependent route; currently worsens)
│ ├── nvg_chime_frb_check.py # Retired: no repeater-linked CHIME DM/mass likelihood
│ ├── nvg_ligo_o4_echo_candidates.py # Predicted echo time delays for massive LIGO O4 remnants (M ~ 65 M_sun)
│ ├── nvg_relic_dark_matter.py # Legacy relic-target inversion into coupling/mass (not abundance prediction)
│ ├── nvg_glueball_mass.py # Scalar glueball mass calculation
│ ├── nvg_neutrino_mass.py # Majorana neutrino mass see-saw limit
│ ├── nvg_starquake_qpo.py # Magnetar starquake QPO shear frequencies
│ ├── nvg_primordial_gw_comb.py # Primordial gravitational wave frequency comb generator
│ ├── nvg_axion_mass.py # Topological axion decay constant and mass calculation
│ ├── nvg_de_axion_crosscheck.py # Dark-energy/axion cross-check vs the dark-dimension window (CONJECTURED)
│ ├── nvg_dual_hierarchy_identity.py # Triple-hierarchy identity (density/entropy/mass from 3c²/8πG)
│ ├── nvg_ns_mass_bound.py # Parameter-free NS mass bound M_Pl³/M_Ω² = 2.21 M_⊙ + live cut
│ ├── nvg_sigma_mnu_corner.py # Cornered sum Σm_ν = 59 meV vs DESI/CMB-S4
│ ├── nvg_katrin_mbeta.py # m_β = 8.9 meV vs KATRIN/Project 8 (29 meV corrected)
│ ├── nvg_echo_o4_observers.py # Observer card: echo parameters for 4 O4 candidates
│ ├── nvg_perihelion_shift.py # Binary pulsar strong-field periastron shift calculation
│ ├── nvg_cmb_temperature.py # CMB temperature today from QCD bounce scale
│ ├── nvg_baryon_asymmetry.py # Baryon asymmetry (eta_B) from Genesis bounce
│ ├── nvg_postmerger_fpeak.py # Post-merger peak GW frequency from VMF TOV R_1.6
│ ├── nvg_ns_redshift.py # Surface gravitational redshift z_surf from VMF R_1.4
│ ├── nvg_sgr_temperature.py # SGR 1935+2154 quiescent spot temperature
│ ├── nvg_speed_of_sound_curve.py # Speed of sound c_s^2(n_B) profile and conformal bound
│ ├── nvg_ns_g_modes.py # WKB g-mode forecast with assumed composition (no detector likelihood)
│ ├── nvg_higgs_mass_shift.py # Higgs boson mass shift from QCD vacuum condensate
│ ├── nvg_dna_chirality.py # DNA homochirality and biological θ-coherence scales
│ ├── nvg_ds_core_oscillations.py # de Sitter core standing wave oscillations
│ ├── nvg_pbh_dark_matter.py # PBH ladder and normalized-profile benchmark bookkeeping
│ ├── nvg_wd_cooling.py # White Dwarf cooling rate under VMF
│ ├── run_nvg_suite.py # MASTER SCRIPT: generates final uncertainty report
│ ├── run_all_checks.py # Automated suite runner for all physical verifications
│ ├── nvg_genesis_observable.py # Genesis instanton → Hubble horizon match
│ ├── nvg_vacuum_w_field_derivation.py # Numerical verification of the W-field phase transition
│ ├── nvg_strong_cp_solution.py # Strong CP problem solution from V(W,θ)
│ ├── nvg_double_slit_madelung.py # Double-slit interference from W-condensate Madelung hydrodynamics
│ ├── nvg_arrow_of_time.py # Arrow of time from vacuum phase θ topology
│ ├── nvg_dm_direct_detection.py # Proof that W ≠ WIMP: null WIMP prediction from 3 coupling channels
│ ├── nvg_bell_inequality.py # Bell violation from vacuum phase θ coherence
│ ├── nvg_heisenberg_proof.py # Heisenberg uncertainty = Cauchy-Schwarz theorem
│ ├── nvg_wavefunction_collapse.py # "Collapse" = thermalization of vacuum phase θ
│ ├── nvg_neutrino_seesaw.py # Neutrino mass from θ-seesaw without right-handed neutrinos
│ ├── nvg_quantum_gravity.py # Quantum gravity without quantization: Hawking from θ-thermalization
│ ├── nvg_fine_structure.py # α_EM = 1/137 from vacuum polarization Z_EM(W₀)
│ ├── nvg_antimatter_topology.py # Antimatter as θ → −θ, annihilation = vortex reconnection
│ └── nvg_rhic_bell_test.py # 🔥 RHIC Bell Test: S_CHSH(T > T_c) → 0, experimental protocol
├── visualization/
│ ├── nvg_3d_viz_v2.html # Interactive 3D Tolman Cycles Simulator
│ ├── nvg_ns_merger_3d.html # Interactive 3D BNS Merger & Mass Melting
│ └── nvg_3d_viz_v2_ru.html # Interactive 3D Universe Simulator (RU)
├── .docs/
│ ├── NVG_VERIFICATION_MATRIX_RU.md # Matrix of falsifiable predictions
│ ├── NVG_EM_OBSERVABLES.md # Strict Checklist of EM Observables
│ ├── NVG_ELECTROMAGNETIC_EXTENSIONS.md # EM waves, wave-particle duality, research directions (RU)
│ └── NVG_ELECTROMAGNETIC_EXTENSIONS_EN.md # English version
├── README.md
└── README_RU.md
The repository includes a process-check suite and a canonical runtime ledger. These execute declared calculations and expose their evidence boundaries; a green process exit is not an observational confirmation.
# Install dependencies
pip install numpy scipy
# Run the master verification suites
python verification/nvg_verification_suite.py # Process checks only (not scientific verification)
python verification/nvg_advanced_calculations.py # Runtime evidence-status ledger; retired/forward rows remain non-evidence
python verification/run_all_checks.py # Executes the process harness (not scientific verification)
# Run specific predictive scripts
python verification/nvg_gw_echoes.py # Predicts LIGO/Virgo GW Echoes
python verification/nvg_cyclic_lifetimes.py # Calculates Tolman cycle durations
python verification/nvg_hadron_mass_fractions.py # Shows the 91% nonperturbative QCD mass
python verification/nvg_full_ns_eos.py # Solves the NS EOS and TOV equations
python verification/nvg_fair_hades_link.py # Predicts the 20% rho-meson mass drop
python verification/nvg_magnetar_closure.py # Closure checks for the revised magnetar scenario
python verification/nvg_1e161348_fallback_torque.py # Fallback-disk braking for 1E 161348-5055
python verification/nvg_magnetar_population_scan.py # Catalog scan and appendix export for the magnetar population
python verification/nvg_magnetar_mass_correlation.py # Statistical correlation audit of reconstructed masses
python verification/nvg_new_predictions.py # Quantitative predictions (FAIR, post-merger GW shift, LMXB)
python verification/nvg_unified_field_equations.py # Verification of the unified field equations (bounce and magnetars)
python verification/nvg_hades_dielectron_sim.py # HADES/CBM in-medium rho dielectron spectral simulation
python verification/nvg_gw_echo_waveforms.py # Post-merger black hole GW echoes waveform template simulator
python verification/nvg_dark_energy_desi.py # Dark energy w0-wa parameter alignment with DESI DR2
python verification/nvg_pbh_jwst_seeds.py # JWST early black hole seeding puzzle simulation
# Electromagnetic extensions and vacuum properties
python verification/nvg_em_extensions_proofs.py # Lorentz invariance, vacuum polarization
python verification/nvg_em_priority2_formal.py # Maxwell from S[g,W,A], ε_eff, decoherence
# Astrophysical and cosmological observables
python verification/nvg_cosmology_tensions.py # Hubble/S8 tensions, BBN constraints
python verification/nvg_cooling_dark_matter.py # PBH Dark Matter, NS Cooling dichotomy
python verification/nvg_iloveq_gw_echoes.py # I-Love-Q transform, GW echo templates
python verification/nvg_cmb_smbh_cyclic.py # CMB anomalies, Early SMBHs
python verification/nvg_black_hole_entropy.py # BH core, entropy reset
python verification/nvg_hyperon_puzzle_solution.py # Hyperon threshold proxy (no complete-likelihood resolution)
python verification/nvg_hyperon_puzzle_tov.py # TOV solver for Hyperon Puzzle (NL3/SLy baselines & figures)
python verification/nvg_advanced_observables_I.py # HADES spectrum, z_surf, cycles
python verification/nvg_advanced_observables_II.py # CMB P(k), EHT shadows, PBH mass
python verification/nvg_advanced_observables_III.py# Mesons, Lorentz, NS Cooling
python verification/nvg_em_maxwell_decoherence.py # Maxwell (eps_eff), Transfer Function
python verification/nvg_grmhd_surrogate.py # EOB surrogate BNS merger (GW Strain)
python verification/nvg_detector_forward_model.py # HADES/CBM Forward Model
python verification/nvg_pulsar_population_test.py # Retired: no ATNF mass/age/luminosity likelihood
python verification/nvg_pbh_continuity_test.py # PBH continuous mass spectrum
python verification/nvg_joint_ns_inference.py # Joint NS Inference (Likelihood)
python verification/nvg_observational_data_fit.py # Fits Planck PR4, DESI DR2, GW170817, and cooling
python verification/nvg_new_directions_verification.py # Status ledger; JWST/ATNF claims retired, GW echo is mass-only forward
python verification/nvg_litebird_prediction.py # Predicts B-mode polarization tensor cutoff (LiteBIRD 2032)
python verification/nvg_nicer_j0437_check.py # Validates NVG radius against 2024 NICER PSR J0437-4715 bounds
python verification/nvg_nanograv_background.py # Retired PBH–NANOGrav channel abundance cross-check
python verification/nvg_hubble_tension.py # Calculates H_0 bounds from the Tolman cycle
python verification/nvg_sgr_frb_rate.py # Models magnetar mass vs stability and FRB burst rate
python verification/nvg_dark_energy_w0wa.py # Derives CPL dark energy parameters w0-wa
python verification/nvg_dark_energy_desi.py # Verifies dark energy w0-wa alignment vs DESI DR2
python verification/nvg_s8_tension_check.py # Maintained S8 tension accounting (currently worsens)
python verification/nvg_chime_frb_check.py # Retired: no repeater-linked CHIME DM/mass likelihood
python verification/nvg_ligo_o4_echo_candidates.py # Echo delay times for O4 candidates (M ~ 65 M_sun)
python verification/nvg_relic_dark_matter.py # Legacy relic-target inversion into coupling/mass (not abundance)
python verification/nvg_glueball_mass.py # Calculates the scalar glueball mass
python verification/nvg_neutrino_mass.py # Calculates the Majorana neutrino mass limit
python verification/nvg_starquake_qpo.py # Validates magnetar QPO starquake frequencies
python verification/nvg_primordial_gw_comb.py # Calculates bounce frequencies for Tolman cycles
python verification/nvg_axion_mass.py # Calculates topological axion mass limits
python verification/nvg_de_axion_crosscheck.py # Dark-energy <-> axion-sector cross-check (dark-dimension window)
python verification/nvg_dual_hierarchy_identity.py # Triple-hierarchy identity + cycle-count audit
python verification/nvg_ns_mass_bound.py # Parameter-free NS mass bound + live data cut
python verification/nvg_sigma_mnu_corner.py # Σm_ν = 59 meV: cornered θ-seesaw prediction
python verification/nvg_katrin_mbeta.py # m_β = 8.9 meV vs KATRIN/Project 8 (falsifier m_β > 20 meV)
python verification/nvg_echo_o4_observers.py # Echo observer card for the 4 O4 candidates (Δt = 20-24 ms)
python verification/nvg_perihelion_shift.py # Verifies binary pulsar strong-field periastron shift
python verification/nvg_vacuum_w_field_derivation.py # Models QFT W-field phase transition & VEV
python verification/nvg_cmb_temperature.py # Derives CMB temperature $T_{\rm CMB} = 2.725$ K from QCD bounce scale
python verification/nvg_baryon_asymmetry.py # Computes primordial baryon asymmetry $\eta_B \approx 6 \times 10^{-10}$
python verification/nvg_postmerger_fpeak.py # Reconstructs post-merger peak gravitational wave frequency
python verification/nvg_ns_redshift.py # Solves TOV to compute surface gravitational redshift $z_{\rm surf} = 0.235$
python verification/nvg_sgr_temperature.py # Simulates quiescent thermal cap emission for light magnetars (SGR 1935+2154)
python verification/nvg_ns_g_modes.py # WKB g-mode forecast with assumed composition (no detector likelihood)
python verification/nvg_ds_core_oscillations.py # Computes standing wave oscillations in de Sitter cores
python verification/nvg_pbh_dark_matter.py # Computes PBH normalized profile and benchmark comparisons
python verification/nvg_wd_cooling.py # Computes VMF white dwarf cooling rate deviation
python verification/run_nvg_suite.py # Canonical runtime ledger (NVG_FINAL_REPORT.md)The following list retains historical test proposals and conditional forecasts. Each applies only to its specified extension, inputs and observational model; it is not a list of established consequences of the source-complete action.
-
Gravitational Wave Echoes: A reflective-core template quotes
$\Delta t_{\rm echo}\approx22$ ms for$65,M_\odot$ with$\sim16$ –$34$ ms cutoff sensitivity. Echo existence and amplitude require an independently specified boundary response; they are not fixed by the adopted QCD-scale input alone. -
Heavy-Ion Collisions (FAIR/HADES/NICA): The historical template quotes an instantaneous
$\rho$ -mass drop of about 20% at$2n_0$ . A detector test requires the full in-medium line shape, fireball evolution and experimental response; this drop is not generated by the current source-complete branch. -
CMB Genesis Cutoff: The historical construction stretches a
$1.13$ km scale by about 53 calibrated e-folds and imposes a low-$\ell$ cutoff. It is a candidate template, not an established explanation of$\ell=2,3$ or an exclusion of cosmic variance. -
Neutron Stars: The runtime canonical chain reaches
$M_{\max}=2.048 M_\odot$ with a CSS branch at$c_s^2=1/3$ ; the transition is selected in-sample and is not independent evidence. -
Mass-budget input: Revising the adopted
$M_{\Omega,0}$ interval$851$ –$867$ MeV changes dependent dimensional scales. Testing the identification of this budget with a macroscopic$W_0$ requires explicit operator matching and input covariance. -
EHT comparison: Historical estimates
$\sim10^{-35}$ at the horizon and$\sim10^{-70}$ at the photon ring belong to separate cutoff assumptions; they do not establish exact agreement for the macroscopic Hayward core or a detector-level falsifier for the source-complete action. -
Tolman cycle assignment: Index 77 is an input. The shared 76-doubling calculation yields the conditional scale
$\pi GM/c^3\approx14.1592$ Byr, not a measured age or remaining lifetime; recurrent-cycle dynamics is not derived. -
Tidal Deformability (GW170817): The runtime canonical chain computes
$\Lambda_{1.4}=519.4$ ; the comparison with the declared GW170817 interval$[70,720]$ is conditional/in-sample, not an independent confirmation. -
Multi-Meson Spectroscopy: The historical
$2n_0$ template uses$\rho,\omega$ (-20.0%),$K^*$ (-7.8%),$\phi$ (-2.9%) and$J/\psi$ (-0.4%). These are branch-dependent model shifts for a line-shape study, not a measured hierarchy or outputs of the current one-component EOS. -
Quantitative CMB template: The imposed cutoff tends to a baseline ratio of 1.000 above
$k\sim10^{-3}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ and suppresses power below about$3\times10^{-4}$ Mpc$^{-1}$. This by-construction shape does not establish an exact Planck-data match or its physical origin. - Multi-Mass PBH Spectrum (Dark Matter): The cycle ladder supplies a conditional mass-rung template from the asteroid window through heavy candidates; object-level JWST seeding is retired pending a machine-readable catalogue, occupation model, and selection likelihood.
-
GW Echo Template: Parameterized echo train with decaying amplitude (
$R_{\rm core}^n$ ) and alternating phase — ready-to-use template for LIGO matched-filtering. -
NS cooling sensitivity: The
$1.45M_\odot$ threshold is calibrated; the quoted$10^{33}$ versus$10^{31}$ erg/s regimes are illustrative. Composition, envelope and heating inputs matter, and no independent thermal-population likelihood makes one hot object a complete EOS falsifier. -
Gravitational Redshift and f_peak: Runtime canonical calculations give
$z_{surf} \approx 0.222$ at$1.4 M_\odot$ and$f_{peak} \approx 2.42$ kHz from$R_{1.6}\approx12.65$ km; both are forward calculations, with no observed target yet. -
Cycles and Genesis Robustness: The closed form
$n = N_e/\ln 2 = 76.58 \pm 0.013$ (anchored$H_0 = 72.8$ ) lands exactly inside integer cycle 77 of the Tolman ladder: the interval$N_e \in [76\ln2, 77\ln2] = [52.68, 53.38]$ (verification/nvg_hubble_tension.py). Audit: the previously quoted "77.2" is$\log_4(2.6\times10^{122}/10^{76}) = 77.09$ built on rounded E&L entropy anchors, and "±0.3" is the cycle-interval half-width$\ln2/2$ , not the QCD sensitivity (true value ±0.013) (verification/nvg_dual_hierarchy_identity.py). -
EM-sector sensitivity:
$\epsilon_{\rm eff}=0.135\epsilon_0$ is a conditional value in a phenomenological melting/EM ansatz. It is not a calculated material coefficient of the current source-complete branch. - Lorentz-symmetry check: The stated vacuum ansatz introduces no explicit Lorentz-violating photon term. A zero coefficient in that ansatz is a formal check, not a new fit to GRB timing or polarization data.
-
QNM scope: The historical
$\sim10^{-105}$ frequency-shift estimate assumes a separate Planck-scale cutoff. A perturbation calculation for the macroscopic regular-core geometry is needed before claiming detector indistinguishability. -
Moment of inertia of J0737A: The linked Hartle calculation is a dated alternate calibration, not the maintained canonical chain and carries zero independent evidence weight; future orbital precession measurements remain the discriminating test (
verification/nvg_moment_of_inertia_j0737.py). -
0νββ null test: The minimal
$\theta$ -seesaw predicts$m_{\beta\beta} \in [0, 6.4]$ meV; a confirmed signal with$m_{\beta\beta} > 10$ meV excludes the sector (verification/nvg_neutrinoless_dbeta.py). -
Fifth force at 3.7 mm: The monopole channel of the
$\theta$ mode is identically zero (pseudoscalar); any unpolarized Yukawa signal at 3–4 mm falsifies the sector (verification/nvg_theta_fifth_force.py). -
Cosmic birefringence: Static branch
$\beta = 0$ ; a detection of$\beta \neq 0$ at LiteBIRD precision pins the combination$\gamma_{\rm topo}\Delta\theta$ ($0.033°$ per unit) (verification/nvg_cmb_birefringence.py). -
$\theta$ -mode superradiance: Kerr band$M_{\rm BH} \in [5\times10^{-7}, 1.3\times10^{-6}],M_\odot$ ; a spinning horizon PBH inside the band excludes the horizonless interpretation of the corresponding remnants (verification/nvg_theta_superradiance.py). -
Tidal heating: Horizonless remnants predict a zero absorption-phase contribution in EMRIs vs ~32 cycles for a Kerr BH (LISA) (
verification/nvg_tidal_heating_null.py). -
Dark-sector band discrimination: The NVG bands (8–53 μeV) and the dark-dimension KK tower band (2 meV–1 eV at
$R\in[0.2,100]$ μm) are disjoint — a detection in either band discriminates the programs; live falsifiers: DESI$w(z)\neq-1$ and the kinematic neutrino mass — 2026-08 correction: the KATRIN observable is$m_\beta = \sqrt{\sum|U_{ei}|^2m_i^2} = 8.9$ meV, not 29 meV (equi-weighting$m_3/\sqrt3$ ); registered falsifier$m_\beta > 20$ meV (verification/nvg_de_axion_crosscheck.py). -
Quad-hierarchy identity:
$\rho_c r_c^2 = \rho_{\rm crit}R_{H0}^2 = 3c^2/8\pi G$ → four hierarchies are powers of the single number$e^{N_e} = R_{H0}/r_c$ : density$\rho_c/\rho_{\rm DE} = e^{2N_e}/\Omega_{\rm DE} = 1.85\times10^{46}$ , entropy$S_{\rm now}/S_{\rm gen} = e^{2N_e} = 4^n$ , mass$M_U = M_1\times 2^n = 4.30\times10^{22},M_\odot$ (the Hubble-sphere mass) and time$t_{H0}/t_b = e^{N_e} = 1.13\times10^{23}$ (precision$2\times10^{-15}$ ); the entropy-per-baryon ratio honestly does not close (area law vs volume count). Status: closed identity with a calibrated$H_0$ — consistency, not evidence (verification/nvg_dual_hierarchy_identity.py). -
Dimensional mass-scale diagnostic: $M_{\rm Pl}^3/M_\Omega^2 = 2.211^{+0.042}{-0.041},M\odot$ is a separate dimensional bound diagnostic from the single anchor
$M_\Omega$ , not the runtime canonical TOV result. Its live-data comparison and falsifier are documented inverification/nvg_ns_mass_bound.py; this bound and all alternate fork-B outputs carry their own assumptions and zero independent evidence weight relative to the canonical chain. -
The cornered neutrino-mass sum:
$\Sigma m_\nu = 59.0$ meV — the minimum of normal ordering at$m_1\approx0$ , rigidly fixed by the oscillation splittings; DESI DR1 + CMB + SN (UL 72 meV) leaves a margin of only +13 meV; the disputed negative DESI DR2 posterior ($-75\pm51$ meV) yields a$2.6\sigma$ pull; CMB-S4 ($\sigma\sim15$ meV) will deliver a two-sided verdict: a$\sim4\sigma$ exclusion if the central stays near zero, or conditional agreement if it lands at 59 meV; agreement with this standard normal-ordering limit would not identify an NVG mechanism. Falsifier: a robust$\Sigma m_\nu < 45$ meV under a specified physical cosmological likelihood excludes the minimal$\theta$ -seesaw (verification/nvg_sigma_mnu_corner.py). -
Kinematic neutrino-mass correction and one-sided falsifier: the KATRIN observable
$m_\beta^2 = \sum_i|U_{ei}|^2m_i^2 = 8.9$ meV (minimal NO; 9.0 meV for the anchor spectrum) — earlier "29 meV" citations were the equi-weighting$m_3/\sqrt3$ , not the observable; KATRIN (200 meV design) is honestly insensitive, the two-sided test is Project 8 ultimate ($\sigma\sim10$ meV); registered falsifier: any robust$m_\beta > 20$ meV excludes the sector, since the inverted-ordering floor is 49.2 meV; the consistency triangle$\Sigma m_\nu = 59$ meV /$m_\beta = 8.9$ meV /$m_{\beta\beta}\le 6.4$ meV from one anchor is rigidly closed (verification/nvg_katrin_mbeta.py). -
O4 echo observer card: for the four ROADMAP candidates (GW230518/230615/230922/231215,
$M_{\rm tot} = 61.8$ –$70.2,M_\odot$) the predicted echo spacing is$\Delta t_{\rm echo} = 20.0$ –$23.9$ ms (remnant-mass systematic$\times0.95$ included), carrier$f_{\rm QNM} = 245$ –$278$ Hz, damping$\tau = 3.3$ –$3.7$ ms, 14–16 pulses per comb at$R_{\rm eff} = 0.95$ ; the protocol (search window, bandpass, delay scan$\times0.73$ –$\times1.55$, coherent statistic vs time-slide background) matches the repo pipeline; falsifier: a null deep stack of the full O4 catalog at the tabulated delays drives$R_{\rm eff}\to0$ and falsifies the reflective-core picture of the remnant (verification/nvg_echo_o4_observers.py).
Historical suggestions connect macroscopic oscillators or atomic clocks through a coherent condensate phase. The maintained action supplies neither such oscillators nor a measurable coupling, nonlocal correlation law or detector response. A testable proposal requires those missing ingredients; no predicted Bell anomaly is established.
During the post-bounce expansion at verification/nvg_relic_dark_matter.py).
The repository includes a unified pipeline for reviewers: verification/run_nvg_suite.py.
Running this script automatically generates NVG_FINAL_REPORT.md, which features:
-
Canonical runtime ledger: Executes one TOV + Hinderer chain and records
$M_{\max}$ ,$R_{1.4}$ ,$\Lambda_{1.4}$ , and the conditional reduced$\chi^2$ with provenance. - Honest boundary: Off-anchor uncertainty propagation and inverse QCD reconstruction are currently unsupported and are not reported as results.
- Forecast module: Records future measurements that could test the canonical chain; a process exit code is not a scientific verdict.
- Automatic Evidence Ledger: Maps each maintained result to its source and explicit input/calibration/conditional status.
Oleg Kirichenko — Independent Researcher — urevich55@gmail.com
MIT License — see LICENSE for details.