Decide if to use prefix for object names, and if so, which one

[veosotano]

I propose using the prefix "UI", because it gives the final author breathing room for using their own names without worrying for name collision, and because it means User Interface, which is what the framework is about.

For example:

foo { isA: UIButton }
bar { isA: UIVideoPlayer }
bla {  isA: UIWhatever }

Any more ideas?

[Mouvedia]

Id support a logical prefix (either AXR or HSS).

[jakepetroules]

UI looks pretty but AXR or HSS is probably better. HSS would make the most sense too, since it is an HSS library...

[Mouvedia]

This is related to axr/specification#78.

BTW instead we could prefix with something illegal in normal object names.

[jakepetroules]

That would both look awkward and would be problematic for the parser implementation.

[Mouvedia]

For example what about .?

foo { isA: objectName, .button; }

[jakepetroules]

Again, potentially problematic for the parser implementation. Also, didn't either you or @veosotano want the HSS framework NOT to be specially treated? If so, no naming weirdness.