Skip to content

Explain detector and archive processing steps - #11

Merged
djgormley merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/explanatory-comments
Oct 27, 2026
Merged

djgormley merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/explanatory-comments

Conversation

@djgormley

@djgormley djgormley commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Some detector and archive comments opened on dense implementation detail before saying what the code is for. They're rewritten to introduce the quantities, walk through the operation, and then explain the result. Short comments stay short, and the spelling is American. Comments on the matched-filter cell width and row-sum storage didn't match the implementation, so those are corrected.

Frozen evidence, generated tables, quoted source text, and vendored code are untouched. Python syntax trees and C/CUDA tokens were compared before and after, and the executable logic is unchanged.

3,668 CPU tests passed, 74 were skipped, and 111 CUDA-marked tests were deselected. The two extra GPU-only tests in test_reference_pfb_gpu.py were excluded explicitly, and GPU access stayed disabled. Ruff, the generated FFT-table consistency check, the documentation specifications, the C header check, and the CPU reference build and run all passed.

@djgormley
djgormley merged commit d4dc58c into main Oct 27, 2026
8 checks passed
@djgormley
djgormley deleted the docs/explanatory-comments branch November 2, 2026 01:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant