Skip to content

Docs follow-ups for v1.25.0 - #338

Merged
paxcalpt merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/changelog-typo-1.25.0
Oct 2, 2026
Merged

paxcalpt merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/changelog-typo-1.25.0

Conversation

@paxcalpt

@paxcalpt paxcalpt commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes the 1.25.0 changelog entry, which opened with "Manifests declare" where it means "Manuscripts declare" (rxiv changelog and the upgrade notice print it).

Adds the figures.dependencies key from 1.25.0 to the commented figures block in the rxiv init config template, so new manuscripts show the option. The line uncomments into valid config.

No behaviour change.

The entry opened with "Manifests declare" where it means "Manuscripts declare". rxiv changelog and the upgrade notice print this line.
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 2, 2026 09:25

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot review overview

🟢 Approval recommended

The focused documentation correction is accurate and introduces no functional risk.

Review effort: Balanced
Findings: None

What changed in this PR

Corrects a typo in the v1.25.0 changelog entry displayed by rxiv changelog and upgrade notices.

Changes:

  • Replaces “Manifests” with “Manuscripts.”
File Description
CHANGELOG.md Corrects the v1.25.0 entry’s wording.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

New manuscripts get a commented figures block; it now lists the dependencies key added in 1.25.0, so authors find it without reading the docs.
@paxcalpt paxcalpt changed the title Fix typo in v1.25.0 changelog entry Docs follow-ups for v1.25.0 Oct 2, 2026
@paxcalpt
paxcalpt merged commit a6a4069 into main Oct 2, 2026
10 checks passed
@paxcalpt
paxcalpt deleted the docs/changelog-typo-1.25.0 branch October 2, 2026 10:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants