You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
brokered_connections: two reads carry no provider predicate (blocks the provider sunset flow) #783
Two brokered_connections reads in server/src/plugins/store.ts carry no provider predicate, where the other 11 selects in that file all filter on the active broker:
retireConnectionsFor — the offboarding sweep
brokeredConnectionsFor — the settings-page read
Both are keyed (holder = 'person', userId) only.
Why it matters
retireConnectionsFor finds a person's connections and then calls the active broker's revoke() for each row it found. On a deployment holding rows from both providers, that is a revocation requested at the wrong vendor — which would not recognise the connection — while the audit row records vendorRevocationRequested about access that was never removed. A departed employee keeps live access and the record says otherwise.
brokeredConnectionsFor is milder: rows are resolved at the active provider's canonical URL, so another provider's connections are silently dropped from the settings page.
Why it is not urgent
Unreachable today. The startup activation refusal (assertActivatable, called from server/src/index.ts) refuses to boot when the configured provider differs from the provider on the existing rows, so a mixed deployment cannot start and neither read can see a foreign row.
Both sites were already unfiltered before the Arcade provider work began (base 7b1c20a) — this is pre-existing, not a regression.
Why it needs an issue rather than a fix now
The provider sunset flow is exactly the change that relaxes assertActivatable's refusal, and it turns both sites live. Whoever builds it must add the brokerProvider predicate to both reads. Both call sites now carry comments saying so and naming assertActivatable, but a comment is not a work item.
Also to correct
The design spec's inventory of provider-filtered sites lists the offboarding sweep among them. It is not one — the sweep has no provider filter at all. That line should be corrected when the sunset flow is specced.
Acceptance
Both reads filter on the active broker provider.
A test drives the offboarding sweep on a deployment holding a foreign-provider row and asserts it is not revoked through the active broker and not audited as revoked.
Context: filed from the Arcade provider PR (#770), which does not change either read.
Activity