Skip to content

About

Reproducible benchmark for evaluating direct and pivot-language prompting in Tajik across quality, efficiency, and reliability.

Topics

Resources

Contributing

Security policy

Stars

1 star

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Repository files navigation

Tajik LLM Benchmark

A reproducible framework for studying Tajik-language performance in large language models and whether pivot-language prompting changes accuracy, efficiency, or reliability.

Research objective

The study compares direct Tajik prompting with Persian-, Russian-, and English-pivot conditions across grammar, factual knowledge, code-switching, and open-ended generation. It records answer quality together with token use, estimated API cost, latency, retries, failures, truncation, and format compliance.

The mentor-approved benchmark contains 1,600 items balanced across four task categories and formal and conversational registers.

Partition Items Purpose
Development 200 Prompt, rubric, and pipeline development
Primary test 800 Confirmatory model comparison
Robustness 400 Sensitivity analysis
Reserve 200 Replacement under documented rules

Raw benchmark items, answer keys, approval evidence, credentials, and generated responses are excluded from Git to protect the held-out evaluation.

Experimental design

  • Three version-locked models from each of OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google.
  • Four matched conditions per item: direct Tajik, Persian pivot, Russian pivot, and English pivot.
  • Stateless requests with fixed decoding parameters and recorded model identifiers.
  • Append-only, resumable collection with deterministic request IDs.
  • Exact scoring for closed-form tasks and blinded human evaluation for generation.
  • Paired analyses, confidence intervals, multiple-comparison correction, and inter-rater reliability.
  • Efficiency measures including tokens, latency, cost, failures, and cost per correct response.

No empirical model results are reported until collection and human evaluation are complete.

Repository structure

configs/              experiment and scoring configurations
data/                 local-only benchmark data and access notes
docs/                 methodology and reproducibility documentation
professor_dashboard/  aggregate-results dashboard
runs/                 local-only experimental artifacts
src/tajik_benchmark/  benchmark package
tests/                automated tests

Setup

Python 3.11 or newer is required. The package uses only the standard library at runtime.

python -m venv .venv
.\.venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1
python -m pip install --editable .

Store credentials only in environment variables. Never commit a populated .env file.

$env:OPENAI_API_KEY = "your-key"
$env:ANTHROPIC_API_KEY = "your-key"
$env:GEMINI_API_KEY = "your-key"

Reproducible workflow

tajik-bench validate --items data/dataset1_professor_validated_1600_v1.csv
python -m unittest discover -s tests -v
tajik-bench plan --items data/dataset1_professor_validated_1600_v1.csv --config configs/api_smoke_test_3_v1.json --output runs/api-smoke-plan.jsonl
tajik-bench run --plan runs/api-smoke-plan.jsonl --output runs/api-smoke-raw.jsonl --pricing configs/api_pricing_2026-09-09.json --max-cost-usd 0.25

The runner writes every response immediately, resumes completed requests, retries transient failures, and records provider usage fields and the dated pricing snapshot. Full procedures are in docs/METHODOLOGY.md.

Research integrity

Only development items may guide prompt, rubric, or model-selection decisions. Primary-test and robustness items must not be inspected, edited, or used for model selection after the experiment is frozen. Reserve substitutions must follow a documented, model-blind rule.

Current status

  • Dataset structure and all 1,600 items approved by the research mentor.
  • Validation, planning, provider adapters, response logging, scoring, analysis, and dashboard generation implemented.
  • Live response collection and human rating pending.

Author

Bahrom Ashurov — Lumiere research project.

License and citation

Code and data reuse terms are not yet finalized. See LICENSE and CITATION.cff. Contact the author before redistributing benchmark items or answer keys.

About

Reproducible benchmark for evaluating direct and pivot-language prompting in Tajik across quality, efficiency, and reliability.

Topics

Resources

Contributing

Security policy

Stars

1 star

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages