diff --git a/.github/CODEOWNERS b/.github/CODEOWNERS index 1ca7bc0b681..505abf20b80 100644 --- a/.github/CODEOWNERS +++ b/.github/CODEOWNERS @@ -700,10 +700,8 @@ peps/pep-0819.rst @emmatyping peps/pep-0820.rst @encukou peps/pep-0821.rst @JelleZijlstra peps/pep-0822.rst @methane -# ... -peps/pep-0824.rst @gvanrossum peps/pep-0823.rst @gvanrossum -# ... +peps/pep-0824.rst @gvanrossum peps/pep-0825.rst @warsaw @dstufft peps/pep-0826.rst @savannahostrowski peps/pep-0827.rst @1st1 diff --git a/peps/pep-0823.rst b/peps/pep-0823.rst index 3aa92313963..4f84bbb92e6 100644 --- a/peps/pep-0823.rst +++ b/peps/pep-0823.rst @@ -2,11 +2,12 @@ PEP: 823 Title: None-aware access operators Author: Marc Mueller Sponsor: Guido van Rossum -Discussions-To: Pending +Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-823-none-aware-access-operators/109159 Status: Draft Type: Standards Track Created: 20-Sep-2026 Python-Version: 3.16 +Post-History: `22-Sep-2026 `__ Abstract @@ -569,7 +570,7 @@ Coalesce ``??`` and coalesce assignment operator ``??=`` :pep:`505` also suggested the addition of a "``None`` coalescing" operator ``??`` and a "``None`` coalescing assignment" operator ``??=``. As the ``None``-aware access operators have their own use cases, the coalescing -operators were moved into a separate document, see PEP-824. +operators were moved into a separate document, see :pep:`824`. Both proposals can be adopted independently of each other. ``None``-aware function calls diff --git a/peps/pep-0824.rst b/peps/pep-0824.rst index 7b895f22101..45f94657d3d 100644 --- a/peps/pep-0824.rst +++ b/peps/pep-0824.rst @@ -2,11 +2,12 @@ PEP: 824 Title: None-coalescing operators Author: Marc Mueller Sponsor: Guido van Rossum -Discussions-To: Pending +Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-824-none-coalescing-operators/109161 Status: Draft Type: Standards Track Created: 20-Sep-2026 Python-Version: 3.16 +Post-History: `22-Sep-2026 `__ Abstract @@ -372,7 +373,7 @@ Deferred Ideas :pep:`505` also suggest the addition of the "``None``-aware access" operators ``?.`` and ``?[ ]``. As the "``None``-coalescing" operators have their own use cases, the "``None``-aware access" operators were -moved into a separate document, see PEP-823. Both proposals can be +moved into a separate document, see :pep:`823`. Both proposals can be adopted independently of each other. Other conditional assignment operators